Wildlife Oxymoronics

     “The enemies of the wild are the abundant and ever-multiplying forms of human control…..Many forms of control are dangerous to the wild, from cadastral maps, bureaucracy, statistics, surveillance, biotechnology, and nanotechnology to social engineering and scientific management…..to the mass production of game species, an intellectual move that laid the foundations of modern wildlife management (an oxymoron).”
Jack Turner

Wildlife management is an oxymoron, one of many, including serious fun, common sense, fighting for peace and Creation Science that modern civilization blithely uses to obscure reality and the personal and public costs and consequences of its out of control, obsessive, even psychotic need to control the uncontrollable and understand the unknowable. A couple of years ago western wildlife oxymoronics were showcased when the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Wildlife Services and/or the Idaho Department of Fish and Game hired a helicopter for an undisclosed sum of taxpayers dollars. The helicopter was installed with an undisclosed number of “aerial gunners” who were paid an undisclosed amount of taxpayer dollars to fly around north-central Idaho on a mission to shoot and kill wolves from the air “…in an effort to protect elk herds.”
After an undisclosed number of hours of flying time the aerial gunners managed to kill five wolves. Idaho Department of Fish and Game Deputy Director Jim Unsworth announced that the hunt was being suspended indefinitely because it was “inefficient and expensive.” He said the wolves are in thick timber which makes them difficult to shoot from the air. Unsworth told the Lewiston Tribune, “The elk and deer are on green-up down low and the wolves are there with them. They are in that lower-elevation, big-timber kind of stuff. We can find the packs, but you can’t find the wolves to do anything from a control standpoint.”
‘From a control standpoint’ is an interesting phrase. If ‘you’ can’t find the wolves to do anything then there is no point of control to stand on. Maybe ‘you’ who can’t find the wolves should check in with ‘we’ who can find the packs where the wolves, by definition and practice, hang out. Every report, justification or rationale for killing wolves that I’ve seen is always filled with interesting phrases, some oxymoronic, others just colorful, opaque, incomplete, misleading and, on occasion, unreal, and they always raise more questions than they answer. Even people like myself who view the term ‘wildlife management’ as an oxymoron and are not in favor of shooting wolves, especially at taxpayer expense, appreciate and ponder such colorful language as “The elk and deer are on green-up down low and the wolves are there with them. They are in that lower-elevation big timber kind of stuff.”
One obvious question: didn’t the Idaho Department of Fish and Game know the wolves they couldn’t find were in that lower-elevation big timber kind of stuff? If not, why not? Isn’t it the job of Fish and Game in their oxymoronic role of managing wildlife to know that wolves favor that big timber kind of stuff and that to a healthy wolf’s ears the sound of a helicopter is as loud as its inefficiency and expense to the taxpayer, from a control standpoint? For those people who enjoy the thrill of killing defenseless wildlife from the air, it must have been a great hooah experience at taxpayer’s expense, but, as is so often the case from a control standpoint those hooah moments are inefficient and expensive.
It’s simply not true that “…you can’t find the wolves to do anything from a control standpoint.” At least five wolves were found and killed, and, from a control standpoint, it would be an interesting and revealing exercise in accountability to determine the cost of killing each wolf.
The contention that the inefficient and expensive wolf killings were carried out “…in an effort to protect the elk herds,” is, at best, incomplete, and, at worst, misleading. Wolves and elk existed as wild creatures for thousands of years on this continent in an unmanaged natural (and wild) balance between predator and prey in which elk herds are kept healthy by wolves dining on the old, the weak, the lame and the slow. Without human ‘management’ they would continue with their wild, natural dynamic. Everyone who has looked into it, or even thought a bit about it, knows that the biggest dangers to elk are loss of habitat due to human encroachment on their natural territory and hunting of elk by those same humans.
Most of the elk habitat loss is due to real estate development and the public lands welfare sheep and cattle ranching industry which each year loses a miniscule number of their flocks and herds to wolves. And hunting is a big business. Killing wolves on taxpayer dollars is not done to protect elk herds from being killed by wolves, but, rather, to eliminate competition for killing those elk herds so that the wolves’ fellow predator, man, will have more elk to kill. It is also done to placate the strong political lobby of the cattle and sheep industry.
Aerial gunners in helicopters or ground troops on foot (or on 4 wheelers, or trucks) are not killing wolves at government expense to protect elk or any other wildlife. They are the hired guns of industry. Those amateur sportsmen who kill wolves for sport turn the word sport into an oxymoron.

2 thoughts on “Wildlife Oxymoronics

  1. Human-being (noun) – a formerly wild-animal, modernly confined by neurotic complexities.

    Human beings, the ultimate oxymoron; a brain that provided our species intellectual capacity to reach one of the top rungs of the ecological ladder has also created the road to our demise with the by-product of our “life-changing” engineered food and nature-decoupling technologies.
    Consciousness is the mechanism for the sometimes unintelligible contradiction of our realities; empathic societies made of selfish individuals, need for solitude versus desire of company. Insanity births from the constraints of contradiction because insanity is the undefined self. Schrodinger might have had an interesting thought on reality’s dual nature brought by the characteristics of the “reality contradiction”. Since consciousness creates contradiction, humans spend a great deal of time attempting to manipulate that consciousness with pharmaceuticals, hallucinogenics, hormones, etc. to either create or unblock perceived conditions of reality. Therefore, absolute reality exists independently for each animal on planet Earth, but our conscious manipulation extends to the sub-conscious manipulation of reality for other animals (human and non-human), also known as the ‘fight for power’ or ‘urge to control.’
    Funny thing about independent control is desire. Literary minds of 19th Century Russia spent pages searching for resolve between the poles of control and desire in words of Crime and Punishment and Anna Karenina, to little avail. Society becomes dangerous with its ability to fabricate individual desire. Humans in the United States are conditioned to suppress innate desire and so become lured by consumerism, politics and pop-culture. This is very dangerous to the individual spirit, loosing desire correlates to a loss of self. Desire drives passion; passion drives authenticity of spirit; so passion actualizes spirit. Human beings are piles of dust organized into mind, body and spirit, who seek to avoid insanity because of the uncertainty that defines insane.
    The interesting news, it’s possible every human being is insane and yet we create a huge stigma around what we believe to be “normal” versus “poor” mental health. To avoid a notion of ‘insanity’ many people latch on to whatever external definition they can: career, list of credentials, dogma, and then project these trivialities as identity – I think that’s why many people describe a ‘mid-life crisis’ (or why I’m experiencing a quarter-life crisis); latching requires an ever-so-slight denial of self, and the pattern is reproduced and capitulated through society, in my observed experience.
    As human beings we belong to the animal kingdom; as children, we generally lack control of conditioning which might affect perception of innate desire. It is possible we are completely unable to recognize true desire because we have largely lost ourselves as members of the biosphere, catalyzed by the industrial revolution and human technological dependence. We have created a public education system to mass produce socialized human beings banked with facts guised as knowledge. Many teenagers leave these institutions filled with intentions of what they should do, intentions more likely yielded by observation of expectation over individual passion. For many people this system works and that explains the state of current society, an anthropomorphic resource monger.

    So what happens when an individual disagrees with their society’s mission statement? In addition to self, is change actually possible?

    To Napoleon Hill’s “Conquer self else be conquered by self” I say:
    I am playing with fire.
    Aware of lions in slumber I enter the cage…
    quietly.
    Will I be heard?
    My dreams, my gut say it’s only a matter of time.
    So, the answer?
    Stop the nonsense.
    Otherwise risk disappointing individuals of reverence….

    I’m going, though I shouldn’t, and I’m excited. All so curious, maybe that’s the thing, maybe it’s not curious at all. Not bad or terrible. Human making choices that feel great….
    I’ve an addictive personality. If it feels good I want more, and not merely want.. want intensely, a desire to the point of obsession. Unfortunately recognition has not the power to overcome. But, recognition will, hopefully, prevent ruin.

    I’ve thought about this post, “Wildlife Oxymoronics” for a long time, it has been a nice platform for laying thoughts; thank you.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *